|
|
|
 |
Medical/biological Study (experimental study)Simulated MR magnetic field induces steady-state changes in brain dynamics: Implications for interpretation of functional MR studies. med./biol. By: Marino AA, Carrubba S, Frilot 2nd C, Chesson Jr AL, Gonzalez-Toledo E Published in: Magn Reson Med 2010; 64 (2): 349 - 357 ( PubMed Entry , Journal web site )Aim of study (according to author) To test the hypothesis that a magnetic field comparable to a field generated during a MR scan produced changes in human brain
electrical activity that persisted until the field was removed (called a "presence effect" to distinguish it from evoked potentials). Background/further details: Individual subjects (n=22, 9 males, 13 females) served as their own controls. As a positive control a binaural 424 Hz tone was presented.
Following an acclimation period, every subject underwent three blocks of trials: the magnetic field was applied in either the first or third block, as determined randomly from subject to subject. The data from the block where the field was not applied were analyzed
as a negative control (sham exposure). The auditory stimulus was applied in the middle block (positive control). Endpoint - effects on the neurological system: electrical activity in the brain (EEG)
Exposure General category: magnetic field, 50/60 Hz (AC), MRI FIELD View further expo parametersExposed system: human partial body exposure: coronal plane Methods Endpoint/Measurement parameters/Methodology - effects on the neurological system: electrical activity in the brain (EEG; nonlinear recurrence analysis and linear time averaging analysis)
investigation on living organism investigated organ system: brain/CNS
time of investigation: before, during and after exposure
Main outcome of study (according to author) Using non-linear recurrence analysis, changes in brain activity lasting 1 sec (the longest interval considered) were found in 21 of 22 subjects. The "presence effect" was not detected using linear analysis and was reversible, as indicated by a return of brain activity to baseline levels in all subjects within 2 seconds of field offset.
The authors suggest that actual MRI magnetic fields produce nonlinear steady-state perturbations of brain dynamical activity. The effect may influence the picture of brain connectivity inferred in some functional MRI studies. (Study character: medical/biological study, experimental study, full/main study)
Study funded by Related articles 
- Carrubba S et al. (2010): Numerical analysis of recurrence plots to detect effect of...
- Carrubba S et al. (2008): Magnetosensory evoked potentials: consistent nonlinear phenomena.
- Carrubba S et al. (2007): Nonlinear EEG activation evoked by low-strength low-frequency magnetic fields.
- Carrubba S et al. (2007): Evidence of a nonlinear human magnetic sense.
- Carrubba S et al. (2006): Detection of nonlinear event-related potentials.
Glossary: 50/60 Hz, AC, acclimation, auditory, biological, brain, CNS, EEG, electrical, endpoint, evoked potentials, exposure, full/main study, functional MRI, human, hypothesis, Hz, linear, magnetic fields, magnetic flux density, MRI, negative control, neurological, nonlinear, partial body exposure, positive control, randomly, reversible, sham exposure, stimulus, subjects, tone |
 |
 |
© 1997 - 2010, Research Center for Bioelectromagnetic Interaction (femu - RWTH Aachen University, Germany). The informational contents of the EMF-Portal are available free of charge for personal and strictly non-commercial purposes. The informational contents of the EMF-Portal may be retrieved, read or printed, but not (i) copied, (ii) changed or (iii) saved in any format, neither electronically nor on other storage media. Permissions for publication, reproduction, commercial purposes or third party propagation of contents of the EMF-Portal – including partial excerpts or revised formats – have to be obtained from the femu Aachen University-copyright holders. By retrieving, reading or printing these documents you expressly state your agreement with all conditions in the fine print. |
|