Study type:
Medical/biological study
(experimental study)
Frequency dependence of the cardiac threshold to alternating current between 10 Hz and 160 Hz.
med./bio.
By:
Malkin RA, de Jongh Curry A
Published in: Med Biol Eng Comput 2003; 41 (6): 640645
Aim of study (acc. to author)
Background/further details
Endpoint
Exposure
Exposure
Parameters
Exposure 1:
10–160 Hz
Exposure duration:
5 s
guinea pigs: I = 25 µA  3000 µA in steps of 25 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
dogs: I = 20 µA  1000 µA in steps of 20 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
Exposure 2:
10–160 Hz
Exposure duration:
5 s
guinea pigs: I = 25 µA  3000 µA in steps of 25 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
dogs: I = 20 µA  1000 µA in steps of 20 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
Exposure 3:
10–160 Hz
Exposure duration:
5 s
guinea pigs: I = 25 µA  3000 µA in steps of 25 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
dogs: I = 20 µA  1000 µA in steps of 20 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
Frequency
10–160 Hz
Type
Waveform
Exposure duration
5 s
Measurand
Value
Type
Method
Mass
Remarks
cf. remarks




guinea pigs: I = 25 µA  3000 µA in steps of 25 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
cf. remarks




dogs: I = 20 µA  1000 µA in steps of 20 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
Frequency
10–160 Hz
Type
Waveform
Exposure duration
5 s
Measurand
Value
Type
Method
Mass
Remarks
cf. remarks




guinea pigs: I = 25 µA  3000 µA in steps of 25 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
cf. remarks




dogs: I = 20 µA  1000 µA in steps of 20 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
Frequency
10–160 Hz
Type
Waveform
Exposure duration
5 s
Modulation type
pulsed
Pulse width
1 ms
Measurand
Value
Type
Method
Mass
Remarks
cf. remarks




guinea pigs: I = 25 µA  3000 µA in steps of 25 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
cf. remarks




dogs: I = 20 µA  1000 µA in steps of 20 µA, 50 µA or 100 µA
Extended view
Compact view
Methods
Endpoint/measurement parameters/methodology
Investigated system:
Investigated organ system:
Time of investigation:
before exposure
during exposure
Main outcome of study (acc. to author)
Study funded by
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Maryland, USA
Related articles
Patel SG et al.
(2007):
Effect of electrode surface area on thresholds for AC stimulation and ventricular fibrillation.
Fernengel A et al.
(2007):
Inappropriate implantable cardioverterdefibrillator shock induced by electromagnetic interference while taking a shower.
Boyle PM et al.
(2007):
Behaviour of the purkinje system during defibrillationstrength shocks.
Djiane P
(2003):
Electromagnetic interferences with stimulation and defibrillation: the point of view of the specialist
Papazov S et al.
(2002):
Electrical current distribution under transthoracic defibrillation and pacing electrodes.
Swerdlow CD et al.
(1999):
Cardiovascular collapse caused by electrocardiographically silent 60Hz intracardiac leakage current. Implications for electrical safety.
Roy OZ et al.
(1977):
Intracardiac Catheter Fibrillation Thresholds as a Function of the Duration of 60 Hz Current and Electrode Area.