Medical/biological study (observational study)

Neurophysiological study of patients with perceived 'electrical hypersensitivity'. med./bio.

By: Lyskov E, Sandström M, Hansson Mild K

Published in: Int J Psychophysiol 2001; 42 (3): 233-241

Aim of study (acc. to author)

To investigate the baseline neurophysiological characteristics of the central and autonomous nervous system regulation and their reactivity to different functional tests in patients with perceived electrosensitivity in comparison to a control group.

Background/further details

20 hypersensitive patients and 20 control subjects participated in the study. The neurophysiological parameters were measured before and during the functional tests (e.g., heart rate during rest and standing). Electromagnetic field exposure was not performed, but the groups were characterized.

Endpoint

hypersensitivity/subjective complaints

Exposure

- not extractable

No exposure details are available.

Exposed system:

human

Methods Endpoint/measurement parameters/methodology

effects on the cardiovascular system: blood pressure, heart rate (ECG; during rest and standing)
effects on the neurological system: critical fusion frequency, EEG (visual evoked potentials (VEP))
hypersensitivity/subjective complaints: self-reported complaints (tiredness, fatigue, headache, dizziness, breathing difficulties, vomiting, skin symptoms (tingling, itching, redness, dryness) and ocular symptoms (eye fatigue, eye irritation)
electrodermal activity (during response to audio tones), respiration

Investigated system:

investigation on living organism

Investigated organ system:

Main outcome of study (acc. to author)

Several neurophysiological variables were found to differ between the hypersensitive patients and the control group. The mean value of the heart rate in rest condition was higher in the patient group compared to the control group whereas heart rate variability and response to the functional test were decreased in the patient group. Patients also showed differences in the electrodermal activity and in the visual evoked potentials. They had a higher critical fusion frequency.
The authors concluded that the observed group of patients had a trend to a hypertone of the sympathetic nervous system, hyperresponsiveness to sensor stimulation and heightened arousal.

Study character:

medical/biological study
observational study

Study funded by

Swedish Work Environment Fund

Szemerszky R et al. (2015): Is there a connection between electrosensitivity and electrosensibility? A replication study.
Koteles F et al. (2013): Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) and electrosensibility (ES) - are they connected?
Wallace D et al. (2012): Cognitive and physiological responses in humans exposed to a TETRA base station signal in relation to perceived electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
Johansson A et al. (2010): Symptoms, personality traits, and stress in people with mobile phone-related symptoms and electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
Szemerszky R et al. (2010): Polluted places or polluted minds? An experimental sham-exposure study on background psychological factors of symptom formation in 'Idiophatic Environmental Intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields'.
Havas M et al. (2010): Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4 GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system.
Rubin GJ et al. (2010): Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'electromagnetic hypersensitivity'): An updated systematic review of provocation studies.
Röösli M (2008): Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review.
Hillert L et al. (2008): The effects of 884 MHz GSM wireless communication signals on headache and other symptoms: an experimental provocation study.
Landgrebe M et al. (2007): Altered cortical excitability in subjectively electrosensitive patients: Results of a pilot study.
Eltiti S et al. (2007): Does short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals increase symptoms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields? A double-blind randomized provocation study.
Otto M et al. (2007): Electromagnetic fields (EMF): Do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)?
Johansson O (2006): Electrohypersensitivity: state-of-the-art of a functional impairment.
Hillert L et al. (1999): Hypersensitivity to electricity: working definition and additional characterization of the syndrome.
Sandström M et al. (1997): Neurophysiological effects of flickering light in patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity.
Bergqvist U et al. (1994): Skin symptoms and disease during work with visual display terminals.