Study overviews

Please note that a publication can be assigned to several endpoints, i.e. the sum of publications from the individual thematic points and subpoints can be greater than the total sum of actual publications.

Experimental studies on static magnetic fields

2160 studies in total
  1. 948 studies
  2. 720 studies
  3. 447 studies
  4. 371 studies
  5. 341 studies
  6. 169 studies

Other

948 studies in total
  1. 363 studies
  2. 255 studies
  3. 252 studies
  4. 162 studies

Effects on plants 255 studies in total

Authors Year Exposed system Parameters Magnetic flux density/field strength
Nasiri M et al. 2022 plant, <i>Anthemis gilanica</i> static magnetic field -
Xu C et al. 2015 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia</i> ecotype Col-4 and a <i>CRY1/CRY2</i> mutant static magnetic field, geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Xu C et al. 2014 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia</i> ecotype Col‐4 wild‐type and <i>cry1, cry2</i> mutants static magnetic field, shielding/field deprivation, co-exposure, also other exposures without EMF -
Paul AL et al. 2006 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> static magnetic field 0–30 T
Xu C et al. 2018 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> static magnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Hammad M et al. 2020 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> static magnetic field, co-exposure -
Islam M et al. 2020 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> geomagnetic field, static magnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Islam M et al. 2020 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Vigani G et al. 2021 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Bertea CM et al. 2015 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> static magnetic field, geomagnetic field -
Xu X et al. 2023 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> static magnetic field -
Dhiman SK et al. 2023 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (L.) Heynh. (ecotype Landsberg erecta, Ler) and isogenic mutants (seedlings) static magnetic field, DC, shielding/field deprivation -
Pazur A et al. 2009 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (equorin expressing mutant <i>Col0-1 Aeq Cy+</i>) and wild type magnetic field, 50/60 Hz, DC, static magnetic field 0.1–65.8 µT
Ahmad M et al. 2007 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (seedlings) static magnetic field, geomagnetic field 33–500 µT
Dhiman SK et al. 2018 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> Heynh. ecotype <i>Landsberg erecta</i> and <i>cry1cry2</I> mutant static magnetic field, DC -
Agliassa C et al. 2018 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> ecotype <i>Columbia</I>, <i>cry1cry2</i>, <i>phyA</i>, <i>phyAphyB</i> and <i>phot1</I> mutants (seeds) geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation, co-exposure -
Agliassa C et al. 2019 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> ecotype Col0 seeds static magnetic field, geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Xu C et al. 2021 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> ecotype Columbia Col‐4 wild‐type and cry1/cry2 mutant static magnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Narayana R et al. 2018 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> ecotype Columbia-0 (<i>Col-0</i>) wild type geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Paponov IA et al. 2021 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> ecotype Columbia-0 (<i>Col-0</i>) wild type geomagnetic field, static magnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Parmagnani AS et al. 2022 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> ecotype Columbia-0 (<i>Col-0</i>) wild type geomagnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Pooam M et al. 2019 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> wild type (Wassilewskija) and phytochrome A, B deficient mutants static magnetic field -
Xu C et al. 2013 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>/Columbia static magnetic field, geomagnetic field, DC, shielding/field deprivation 0–1.3 µT
Agliassa C et al. 2018 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>/Columbia 0 geomagnetic field, static magnetic field, shielding/field deprivation -
Jin Y et al. 2019 plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>/Columbia 0 static magnetic field -