lower part of a commercial folder-type phone with the keypad wrapped with 5 mm thick insulation; phone placed in a headset; phone set to testmode for continuous transmission of a clipped sine wave
Korea Health 21 R&D Project (of Ministry of Health, Welfare and Familiy Affairs), Korea
Related articles
Verrender A et al.
(2018):
IEI-EMF provocation case studies: A novel approach to testing sensitive individuals.
van Moorselaar I et al.
(2017):
Effects of personalised exposure on self-rated electromagnetic hypersensitivity and sensibility - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.
Devasia T et al.
(2014):
Acute Effect of Mobile Phone on Cardiac Electrical Activity in Healthy Volunteers.
Witthöft M et al.
(2013):
Are media warnings about the adverse health effects of modern life self-fulfilling? An experimental study on idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF).
Alhusseiny A et al.
(2012):
Electromagnetic energy radiated from mobile phone alters electrocardiographic records of patients with ischemic heart disease.
Kwon MK et al.
(2011):
Effects of RF fields emitted from smart phones on cardio-respiratory parameters: a preliminary provocation study.
Barutcu I et al.
(2011):
Do Mobile Phones Pose a Potential Risk to Autonomic Modulation of the Heart?
Havas M et al.
(2010):
Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4 GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system.
Riddervold IS et al.
(2010):
No effect of TETRA hand portable transmission signals on human cognitive function and symptoms.
Tamer A et al.
(2009):
The cardiac effects of a mobile phone positioned closest to the heart.
Kaul G
(2009):
[Is there an ability to perceive or to be sensitive on?]
Eltiti S et al.
(2009):
Short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals does not affect cognitive functioning or physiological measures in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields and controls.
Furubayashi T et al.
(2009):
Effects of short-term W-CDMA mobile phone base station exposure on women with or without mobile phone related symptoms.
Stovner LJ et al.
(2008):
Nocebo as headache trigger: evidence from a sham-controlled provocation study with RF fields.
Cinel C et al.
(2008):
Exposure to mobile phone electromagnetic fields and subjective symptoms: a double-blind study.
Nieto-Hernandez R et al.
(2008):
Can evidence change belief? Reported mobile phone sensitivity following individual feedback of an inability to discriminate active from sham signals.
Kim DW et al.
(2008):
Physiological effects of RF exposure on hypersensitive people by a cell phone.
Hillert L et al.
(2008):
The effects of 884 MHz GSM wireless communication signals on headache and other symptoms: an experimental provocation study.
Heinrich S et al.
(2007):
[Electromagnetic fields of a UMTS mobile phone base station and possible effects on health - results from an experimental field study].
Eltiti S et al.
(2007):
Does short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals increase symptoms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields? A double-blind randomized provocation study.
Li C et al.
(2007):
Design Guidelines for Radio Frequency Non-contact Vital Sign Detection.
Rubin GJ et al.
(2006):
Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study.
Zwamborn APM et al.
(2003):
Effects of Global Communication system radio-frequency fields on Well Being and Cognitive Functions of human subjects with and without subjective complaints.
