Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: a provocation study.
Published in: Bioelectromagnetics 2009; 30 (8): 641-650
Aim of study (acc. to author)
continuous for 30 min
lower part of a commercial folder-type phone with the keypad wrapped with 5 mm thick insulation; phone placed in a headset; phone set to testmode for continuous transmission of a clipped
sham exposure was conducted.
effects on the
cardiovascular system: pulse rate, heart rate variability, heart rate ( ECG)
thermoregulation: facial skin temperature
hypersensitivity/ subjective complaints: subjective symptoms: redness, itching, warmth, fatigue, headache, dizziness, nausea, palpitation, indigestion ( oral survey, four-point scale, during the measurement of the physiological variables); perception of radiofrequency exposure (every five minutes; question: "Do you feel the electromagnetic field?")
respiratory rate; skin resistence
Investigated organ system:
Time of investigation:
Main outcome of study (acc. to author)
Study funded by
Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea
Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
Korea Health 21 R&D Project (of Ministry of Health, Welfare and Familiy Affairs), Korea
Verrender A et al.
IEI-EMF provocation case studies: A novel approach to testing sensitive individuals.
van Moorselaar I et al.
Effects of personalised exposure on self-rated electromagnetic hypersensitivity and sensibility - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.
Devasia T et al.
Acute Effect of Mobile Phone on Cardiac Electrical Activity in Healthy Volunteers.
Witthöft M et al.
Are media warnings about the adverse health effects of modern life self-fulfilling? An experimental study on idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF).
Alhusseiny A et al.
Electromagnetic energy radiated from mobile phone alters electrocardiographic records of patients with ischemic heart disease.
Kwon MK et al.
Effects of RF fields emitted from smart phones on cardio-respiratory parameters: a preliminary provocation study.
Barutcu I et al.
Do Mobile Phones Pose a Potential Risk to Autonomic Modulation of the Heart?
Havas M et al.
Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4 GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system.
Riddervold IS et al.
No effect of TETRA hand portable transmission signals on human cognitive function and symptoms.
Augner C et al.
GSM base stations: short-term effects on well-being.
Tamer A et al.
The cardiac effects of a mobile phone positioned closest to the heart.
[Is there an ability to perceive or to be sensitive on?]
Eltiti S et al.
Short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals does not affect cognitive functioning or physiological measures in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields and controls.
Furubayashi T et al.
Effects of short-term W-CDMA mobile phone base station exposure on women with or without mobile phone related symptoms.
Stovner LJ et al.
Nocebo as headache trigger: evidence from a sham-controlled provocation study with RF fields.
Cinel C et al.
Exposure to mobile phone electromagnetic fields and subjective symptoms: a double-blind study.
Nieto-Hernandez R et al.
Can evidence change belief? Reported mobile phone sensitivity following individual feedback of an inability to discriminate active from sham signals.
Kim DW et al.
Physiological effects of RF exposure on hypersensitive people by a cell phone.
Hillert L et al.
The effects of 884 MHz GSM wireless communication signals on headache and other symptoms: an experimental provocation study.
Kwon MS et al.
Perception of the electromagnetic field emitted by a mobile phone.
Heinrich S et al.
[Electromagnetic fields of a UMTS mobile phone base station and possible effects on health - results from an experimental field study].
Oftedal G et al.
Mobile phone headache: a double blind, sham-controlled provocation study.
Eltiti S et al.
Does short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals increase symptoms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields? A double-blind randomized provocation study.
Li C et al.
Design Guidelines for Radio Frequency Non-contact Vital Sign Detection.
Regel SJ et al.
UMTS base station-like exposure, well-being, and cognitive performance.
Rubin GJ et al.
Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study.
Zwamborn APM et al.
Effects of Global Communication system radio-frequency fields on Well Being and Cognitive Functions of human subjects with and without subjective complaints.
Leitgeb N et al.
Electrosensibility and electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
Koivisto M et al.
GSM phone signal does not produce subjective symptoms.
Radon K et al.
[Hypersensitivity to Electricity].
Braune S et al.
Resting blood pressure increase during exposure to a radio-frequency electromagnetic field.