Due to a lack of financial resources, we unfortunately have to suspend the import of any new radio frequency and mobile phone-related articles as of now (November 27, 2017). We apologize for this inconvenience and will keep you informed.

Because we received a large number of inquiries, we set up a bank account to accept donations. With their aid, we hope to resume, at least partly, the import of newly published articles to the RF archive of the EMF-Portal. Any contribution is greatly appreciated. Thank you for your kind support!

DONATION ACCOUNT: Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, IBAN: DE27 3905 0000 0013 0040 15, BIC: AACSDE33, Reference: GB-FM/380454/Arbm

Epidemiological study (observational study)

Actual and perceived exposure to electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms: an epidemiological study based on self-reported data and electronic medical records.

Published in: Int J Hyg Environ Health 2015; 218 (3): 331-344

Aim of study (acc. to author)

A health survey of adults in the Netherlands was combined with the electronic medical records to investigate actual and perceived exposure to electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms.

Endpoint/type of risk estimation

Type of risk estimation:
  • prevalence




  • Group:
    • men
    • women
  • Age: ≥ 18 years
  • Observation period: January 2011 - June 2011
  • Study location: Netherlands

Study size

Total 76,684
Eligible 13,007
Participants 5,933
Participation rate 46 %
Statistical analysis method:
  • linear regression
  • logistic regression

Conclusion (acc. to author)

The most prevalent self-reported symptoms in the study population were fatigue (54%), neck or shoulder symptoms (39%), headache (38%) and back pain (36%). Among the respondents 202 (3.5%) were considered as hypersensitive to EMF.
Perceived exposure by study participants had a poor correlation with the actual exposure estimates. No significant association was observed between modeled radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and the investigated outcomes. Associations with non-specific physical symptoms were found for use of an electric blanket and close distance to an electric charger during sleep. Perceived exposure, perceived control and avoidance behavior were associated with the examined outcomes. The association between perceived exposure was stronger for self-reported than for general practitioners-registered non-specific physical symptoms. There was some indication, but no consistent pattern for an interaction between idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI-EMF) and the association between actual exposure and non-specific physical symptoms.
The authors conclude that there is no convincing evidence for an association between everyday life radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific physical symptoms and sleep quality in the population. Better exposure characterization, in particular with respect to sources of extremely low frequency magnetic fields is needed to draw more solid conclusions. The authors argue that perceived exposure is an independent determinant of non-specific physical symptoms.

Study funded by

  • ZonMw, The Netherlands

Related articles

  • Martens AL et al. (2017): Modeled and Perceived Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields From Mobile-Phone Base Stations and the Development of Symptoms Over Time in a General Population Cohort.
  • Domotor Z et al. (2016): Dispositional aspects of body focus and idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF).
  • Baliatsas C et al. (2016): Clinically defined non-specific symptoms in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations: A retrospective before-after study.
  • Szemerszky R et al. (2015): Is there a connection between electrosensitivity and electrosensibility? A replication study.
  • Baliatsas C et al. (2014): Comparing non-specific physical symptoms in environmentally sensitive patients: prevalence, duration, functional status and illness behavior.
  • Bolte JF et al. (2014): Everyday exposure to power frequency magnetic fields and associations with non-specific physical symptoms.
  • Gomez-Perretta C et al. (2013): Subjective symptoms related to GSM radiation from mobile phone base stations: a cross-sectional study.
  • Hagström M et al. (2013): Electromagnetic hypersensitive Finns: Symptoms, perceived sources and treatments, a questionnaire study.
  • Bortkiewicz A et al. (2012): Subjective complaints of people living near mobile phone base stations in Poland.
  • Augner C et al. (2012): Acute effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM mobile phones on subjective well-being and physiological reactions: a meta-analysis.
  • Kato Y et al. (2012): Reported functional impairments of electrohypersensitive Japanese: A questionnaire survey.
  • Baliatsas C et al. (2011): Non-specific physical symptoms in relation to actual and perceived proximity to mobile phone base stations and powerlines.
  • Alazawi SA (2011): Mobile Phone Base Stations Health Effects.
  • Heinrich S et al. (2011): The impact of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields on chronic well-being in young people - A cross-sectional study based on personal dosimetry.
  • Heinrich S et al. (2010): Association between exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields assessed by dosimetry and acute symptoms in children and adolescents: a population based cross-sectional study.
  • Breckenkamp J et al. (2010): [Results of a cross-sectional study on the association of electromagnetic fields emitted from mobile phone base stations and health complaints].
  • Eger H et al. (2010): [Specific symptoms and radiation from mobile basis stations in Selbitz, Bavaria, Germany: evidence for a dose-effect relationship].
  • Blettner M et al. (2009): Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany.
  • Berg-Beckhoff G et al. (2009): Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields.
  • Augner C et al. (2009): Are people living next to mobile phone base stations more strained? Relationship of health concerns, self-estimated distance to base station, and psychological parameters.
  • Thomas S et al. (2008): Personal exposure to mobile phone frequencies and well-being in adults: a cross-sectional study based on dosimetry.
  • Schröttner J et al. (2008): Sensitivity to electricity--temporal changes in Austria.
  • Hutter HP et al. (2006): Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations.
  • Schüz J et al. (2006): The "Mainzer EMF-Wachhund": results from a watchdog project on self-reported health complaints attributed to exposure to electromagnetic fields.
  • Schreier N et al. (2006): The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland.
  • Carlsson F et al. (2005): Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning.
  • Santini R et al. (2003): Survey study of people living in the vicinity of cellular phone base stations.
  • Hillert L et al. (2002): Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey.
  • Levallois P et al. (2002): Study of self-reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California.
  • McMahan S et al. (1995): Symptom prevalence and worry about high voltage transmission lines.