Study type:
Epidemiological study
(observational study)
Meta-analysis of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and cancer risk: a pooled analysis of epidemiologic studies.
epidem.
By:
Zhang Y, Lai J, Ruan G, Chen C, Wang DW
Published in: Environ Int 2016; 88: 36-43
Aim of study (acc. to author)
Further details
Endpoint/type of risk estimation
Exposure
Population
-
Group:
-
Observation period:
1960 - 2009
-
Study location:
USA, Canada, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, France, Italy, Germany, UK, Japan, China, New Zealand, Brazil, Iran
Study size
Other:
13,259 cases and 100,882 controls
Statistical analysis method:
Conclusion (acc. to author)
Overall, increased cancer risk was identified in the population with exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (OR 1.08, CI 1.01-1.15). Grouping according to the countries showed that 20, 18 and 3 out of the 42 included studies were conducted in North American, European and Asian populations, respectively. An increased risk was found in North America (OR 1.10, CI 1.02-1.20), especially in the United States (OR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.20). On the contrary, no statistically significant association between exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and cancer risk was found in the analysis of European studies.
A higher risk was found to be statistically significantly associated with the residential exposed population (OR 1.18, CI 1.02-1.37) in comparison to occupational exposure, exposure to electric blankets and other household appliances. In the included studies, exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields was assessed either by a questionnaire based interview or by measurement or by calculation of the magnetic flux densities. An increased cancer risk was found in interview-based studies (OR 1.16, CI 1.00-1.35). In measurement-based studies, a slight increased risk was found only in premenopausal breast cancer (OR 1.23, CI 1.01- 1.49).
In conclusion the meta-analysis suggests that exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields is associated with cancer risk, mainly in the United States and in residential exposed populations. Methodological challenges might explain the differences among studies.
Related articles
-
Núñez-Enríquez JC et al.
(2020):
Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Childhood B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in a City With High Incidence of Leukemia and Elevated Exposure to ELF Magnetic Fields.
-
Talibov M et al.
(2019):
Parental occupational exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields and risk of leukaemia in the offspring: findings from the Childhood Leukaemia International Consortium (CLIC).
-
Su L et al.
(2016):
Associations of parental occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields with childhood leukemia risk.
-
Salvan A et al.
(2015):
Childhood Leukemia and 50 Hz Magnetic Fields: Findings from the Italian SETIL Case-Control Study.
-
Parodi S et al.
(2014):
Risk of neuroblastoma, maternal characteristics and perinatal exposures: The SETIL study.
-
Sermage-Faure C et al.
(2013):
Childhood leukaemia close to high-voltage power lines--the Geocap study, 2002-2007.
-
Wünsch Filho V et al.
(2011):
Exposure to magnetic fields and childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
-
Baldi I et al.
(2011):
Occupational and residential exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of brain tumors in adults: a case-control study in Gironde, France.
-
Kroll ME et al.
(2010):
Childhood cancer and magnetic fields from high-voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case-control study.
-
Saito T et al.
(2010):
Power-frequency magnetic fields and childhood brain tumors: a case-control study in Japan.
-
Coble JB et al.
(2009):
Occupational exposure to magnetic fields and the risk of brain tumors.
-
Feizi AA et al.
(2007):
Acute childhood leukemias and exposure to magnetic fields generated by high voltage overhead power lines - a risk factor in Iran.
-
Abel EL et al.
(2007):
Use of electric blankets and association with prevalence of endometrial cancer.
-
McElroy JA et al.
(2007):
Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Field and Breast Cancer Risk in a Large, Population-Based, Case-Control Study in the United States.
-
Forssen UM et al.
(2006):
Occupational magnetic field exposure and the risk of acoustic neuroma.
-
Forssen UM et al.
(2005):
Occupational magnetic fields and female breast cancer: a case-control study using Swedish population registers and new exposure data.
-
Kliukiene J et al.
(2004):
Residential and occupational exposures to 50-Hz magnetic fields and breast cancer in women: a population-based study.
-
Kabat GC et al.
(2003):
Electric blanket use and breast cancer on Long Island.
-
London SJ et al.
(2003):
Residential magnetic field exposure and breast cancer risk: a nested case-control study from a multiethnic cohort in Los Angeles County, California.
-
Labreche F et al.
(2003):
Occupational exposures to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and postmenopausal breast cancer.
-
Kliukiene J et al.
(2003):
Follow-up of radio and telegraph operators with exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of breast cancer.
-
Zhu K et al.
(2003):
Use of electric bedding devices and risk of breast cancer in African-American women.
-
Schoenfeld ER et al.
(2003):
Electromagnetic fields and breast cancer on Long Island: a case-control study.
-
Davis S et al.
(2002):
Residential magnetic fields and the risk of breast cancer.
-
van Wijngaarden E et al.
(2001):
Population-based case-control study of occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and breast cancer.
-
Bethwaite P et al.
(2001):
Acute leukemia in electrical workers: a New Zealand case-control study.
-
McElroy JA et al.
(2001):
Electric blanket or mattress cover use and breast cancer incidence in women 50-79 years of age.
-
Zheng T et al.
(2000):
Exposure to electromagnetic fields from use of electric blankets and other in-home electrical appliances and breast cancer risk.
-
Forssen UM et al.
(2000):
Occupational and residential magnetic field exposure and breast cancer in females.
-
UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators
(1999):
Exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields and the risk of childhood cancer.
-
Gammon MD et al.
(1998):
Electric blanket use and breast cancer risk among younger women.
-
Feychting M et al.
(1998):
Magnetic fields and breast cancer in Swedish adults residing near high-voltage power lines.
-
Coogan PF et al.
(1998):
Exposure to power frequency magnetic fields and risk of breast cancer in the Upper Cape Cod Cancer Incidence Study.
-
Li CY et al.
(1997):
Residential exposure to 60-Hertz magnetic fields and adult cancers in Taiwan.
-
Michaelis J et al.
(1997):
Childhood leukemia and electromagnetic fields: results of a population-based case-control study in Germany.
-
Stenlund C et al.
(1997):
Occupational exposure to magnetic fields in relation to male breast cancer and testicular cancer: a Swedish case-control study.
-
Tynes T et al.
(1997):
Electromagnetic Fields and Cancer in Children Residing Near Norwegian High-Voltage Power Lines.
-
Tynes T et al.
(1996):
Incidence of breast cancer in Norwegian female radio and telegraph operators.
-
Grayson JK
(1996):
Radiation exposure, socioeconomic status, and brain tumor risk in the US Air Force: a nested case-control study.
-
Preston-Martin S et al.
(1996):
Los Angeles study of residential magnetic fields and childhood brain tumors.
-
Vena JE et al.
(1994):
Risk of premenopausal breast cancer and use of electric blankets.
-
Loomis DP et al.
(1994):
Breast cancer mortality among female electrical workers in the United States.
-
Feychting M et al.
(1993):
Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high-voltage power lines.
-
Olsen J et al.
(1993):
Residence near high voltage facilities and risk of cancer in children.
-
Vena JE et al.
(1991):
Use of electric blankets and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.
