Study type: Medical/biological study (experimental study)

Targeted release of stromal cell-derived factor-1α by reactive oxygen species-sensitive nanoparticles results in bone marrow stromal cell chemotaxis and homing, and repair of vascular injury caused by electrical burns. med./bio.

Published in: PLoS One 2018; 13 (3): e0194298

Aim of study (acc. to author)

SDF-1α-PPADT nanoparticles should be investigated regarding the targeted release of SDF-1α, directional chemotaxis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and repair of vascular injury caused by electrical burns in a rat model.

Background/further details

In a previous study, the authors used the ROS-sensitive thioketal polymer, PPADT, as a nanoparticle carrier. These nanoparticles release drugs in response to high ROS concentrations in tissue lesions, achieving the goal of targeted therapy. The nanoparticle carriers were used to encapsulate SDF (stromal cell-derived factor)-1α, forming SDF-1α-PPADT. SDF-1α is the primary chemokine to induce chemotaxis of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) to a tissue lesion, where they can repair the tissue. These mechanisms were investigated in a rat and mouse modell of vascular injury caused by electrical burns.
Rats or nude mice were divided into two groups: 1) Electrical current exposure and 2) sham exposure. The type and numbers of animals, exposure durations, the time points of measurement as well as the supplementation of SDF-1α, SDF-1α-PPADT or BMSCs varied according to the investigated parameters.



Exposure Parameters
Exposure 1: 50–60 Hz
Exposure duration: 1, 3 or 6 seconds

Exposure 1

Main characteristics
Frequency 50–60 Hz
Exposure duration 1, 3 or 6 seconds
Exposure setup
Exposure source
Setup two copper electrode clips or two copper electrode plates (3 mm × 3 mm) were connected to adjustable voltage regulator (220 V used); rat or mouse was placed in prone position with limbs extended and fixed to a bench; conductive paste was smeared in the region above the ankle of both hind limbs and electrodes were applied
Sham exposure A sham exposure was conducted.
Measurand Value Type Method Mass Remarks
cf. remarks - maximum measured - electric current: 180 mA ± 36 mA at 220 V (current passing through the limbs)

Exposed system:

Methods Endpoint/measurement parameters/methodology

Investigated system:
Time of investigation:
  • after exposure

Main outcome of study (acc. to author)

Exposure to electric current for 6 s could damage vascular endothelial cells, strip off the inner layer of vessels and significantly elevate the local level of ROS and antioxidative enzymes compared to sham exposure. Exposure to electric current for 1 s and 3 s led to significant increase of SDF-1α in wound tissue compared to the sham exposure group, while exposure to electric current for 6 s did not show significant differences.
After injection of fluorescence-labeled SDF-1α-PPADT nanoparticles, the distribution of fluorescence suggested that SDF-1α was distributed primarily at the injury site, and the local SDF-1α levels increased significantly in the exposure group compared to the sham exposure group. Seven days after the electrical injury, aggregation of fluorescence-labeled BMSCs at the injury site was observed in rats with nanoparticles injection. Ten days after the elctrical injury, the endothelial cell arrangement was better organized and continuous, with relatively intact vascular morphology and more blood vessels compared to rats with electrical injury but without nanoparticel injection.
The authors conclude that SDF-1α-PPADT nanoparticles targeted the SDF-1α release at the site of injury, directed BMSC chemotaxis and homing and promoted vascular repair in response to electrical burns in a rat model.

Study character:

Study funded by

Related articles