Medical/biological study (experimental study)

Intercellular communication in plants: evidence for two rapidly transmitted systemic signals generated in response to electromagnetic field stimulation in tomato med./bio.

By: Beaubois E, Girard S, Lallechere S, Davies E, Paladian F, Bonnet P, Ledoigt G, Vian A

Published in: Plant Cell Environ 2007; 30 (7): 834-844

Aim of study (acc. to author)

To study both local (direct) and systemic (distant) responses to electromagnetic field stimulation in wild type and mutant plants with different inhibitors and to measure the accumulation of two transcripts (as markers for stress response) at several times after exposure (immediately after exposure and after 5, 15, 30, and 60 min.).

Background/further details

Naproxen (abscisic acid biosynthesis inhibitor) was added to the culture medium of hydroponically grown wild type tomatoes 24 h before electromagnetic field stimulation. Calcium counteracting drugs (EGTA and LaCl₃) were sprayed simultaneously on the exposed leaf of wild type plants 30 min. before stimulation.

Endpoint

stress response of tomato

Exposure

- RF field
- microwaves

Exposure	Parameters
Exposure 1: 900 MHz Exposure duration: continuous for 10 min	electric field strength: 5 V/m

Exposure 1

Main characteristics

Frequency	900 MHz
Type	electromagnetic field
Exposure duration	continuous for 10 min

Exposure setup

Exposure source	not specified
Chamber	8.4 m x 6.7 m x 3.5 m Faraday cage
Sham exposure	A sham exposure was conducted.

Parameters

Measurand	Value	Type	Method	Mass	Remarks
electric field strength	5 V/m	-	-	-	-

Reference articles

Roux D et al. (2006): Electromagnetic fields (900 MHz) evoke consistent molecular responses in tomato plants
Vian A et al. (2006): Microwave Irradiation Affects Gene Expression in Plants

Exposed system:

plant
tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)/wild type (VFN-8) and Sitiens (abscisic acid mutant) and JL-5 (jasmonic acid mutant)
whole body
partial body: one single old leaf

Methods Endpoint/measurement parameters/methodology

molecular biosynthesis: accumulation of two transcripts (basic leucine-zipper transcription factor (bZIP) mRNA and Pin2 mRNA; quantitative RT-PCR)
stress response of tomato (see "molecular biosynthesis")

Investigated system:

DNA/RNA

Time of investigation:

before exposure
after exposure

Main outcome of study (acc. to author)

Exposing total wild type tomato evoked rapid accumulation of bZIP mRNA in the terminal leaf with kinetics very similar to that seen in response to wounding, while in the abscisic acid mutant (Sitiens) the response was more rapid, but transient.
Exposing just the oldest leaf of a wild type tomato evoked bZIP mRNA accumulation both locally in the exposed leaf and systemically in the unexposed (distant) leaf, although systemic accumulation was delayed somewhat.
Accumulation of Pin2 mRNA was less than bZIP in both the exposed and distant leaves in wild type, but there was no delay in the systemic response. In Sitiens, bZIP mRNA accumulation was far less than in wild type in both local and distant leaves, while Pin2 mRNA accumulation was stronger in the exposed leaf, but totally prevented in the systemic leaf.
In the jasmonic acid mutant (JL-5) and in wild type plants treated with naproxen, responses were similar to those in the abscisic acid mutant, while treatment of the exposed leaf with calcium antagonists totally abolished both local and systemic increases in bZIP transcript accumulation.
In conclusion, the data provide evidence that tomato plants are a good model to study the impact of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as they perceive and respond to electromagnetic fields as though it was an injurious treatment (wound). The findings support the contention that there are two different signals evoking gene expression: a slower one evoking bZIP accumulation and a faster signal evoking Pin2 mRNA accumulation. Finally, they support a complex role for abscisic acid and jasmonic acid in the transcriptional responses.

Study character:

medical/biological study
experimental study
full/main study

Study funded by

Ministère délégué à l'Enseignement supérieur et à la Recherche (Ministry of National Education and Research), France

Comments on this article

Vian A et al. (2007): Plants Respond to GSM-Like Radiations

Soran ML et al. (2014): Influence of microwave frequency electromagnetic radiation on terpene emission and content in aromatic plants
Monselise EB et al. (2011): Bioassay for assessing cell stress in the vicinity of radio-frequency irradiating antennas
Sharma VP et al. (2010): Cell phone radiations affect early growth of Vigna radiata (mung bean) through biochemical alterations
Chen YP et al. (2009): Weak microwave can alleviate water deficit induced by osmotic stress in wheat seedlings
Tkalec M et al. (2009): Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on seed germination and root meristematic cells of Allium cepa L
Sharma VP et al. (2009): Mobile phone radiation inhibits Vigna radiata (mung bean) root growth by inducing oxidative stress
Roux D et al. (2008): Article Addendum: A possible role for extra-cellular ATP in plant responses to high frequency, low amplitude electromagnetic field
Roux D et al. (2008): High frequency (900 MHz) low amplitude (5 V m-1) electromagnetic field: a genuine environmental stimulus that affects transcription, translation, calcium and energy charge in tomato
Engelmann JC et al. (2008): Is gene activity in plant cells affected by UMTS-irradiation? A whole genome approach
Tkalec M et al. (2007): Exposure to radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative stress in duckweed Lemna minor L
Vian A et al. (2007): Plants Respond to GSM-Like Radiations
Roux D et al. (2006): Electromagnetic fields (900 MHz) evoke consistent molecular responses in tomato plants
Vian A et al. (2006): Microwave Irradiation Affects Gene Expression in Plants
Tkalec M et al. (2005): Influence of 400, 900, and 1900 MHz electromagnetic fields on Lemna minor growth and peroxidase activity
Tafforeau M et al. (2004): Plant sensitivity to low intensity 105 GHz electromagnetic radiation
Selga T et al. (1996): Response of Pinus sylvestris L. needles to electromagnetic fields. Cytological and ultrastructural aspects