Abstand zw. exponiertem Objekt und Expositionsquelle
3 mm
Expositionsraum
Each mouse was placed in an aluminium box that was covered inside with RF absorber (< -21.8 dB at 1.5 GHz) except for the roof and the front door. The front door was a new type of transparent (20 dB) absorber. Forty-eight exposure boxes were used (24 for EMF and 24 for sham exposure).
Aufbau
The EMF was directed at the mouse skin by an electrically short monopole antenna with capacitive loading, implemented using a circular metal plate (7 mm diameter, 1 mm thick) attached to the tip of a 1/8-wavelength monopole element, and producing highly localized peak SARs. The roof of the box acted as the ground for the antenna. The mouse was held in a ventilated plastic cylinder with a slit at the top allowing a distance of only 3 mm between skin and antenna.
Zusatzinfo
One week after being subjected to topical application of DMBA on pre-shaved dorsal skin the mice were divided into four groups, receiving EMF exposure, sham exposure, weekly topical applications of TPA as positive control and no treatment as carcinogen control.
Imaida K et al.
(1998):
Lack of promoting effects of the electromagnetic near-field used for cellular phones (929.2 MHz) on rat liver carcinogenesis in a medium-term liver bioassay.
Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass eine Nahfeld-Exposition in einem elektromagnetischen 1.5 GHz-Feld, wie es bei Handys genutz wird, keine erhöhte Wirkung ausübt auf die Haut-Tumorentwicklung, die durch DMBA ausgelöst wird.
Association of Radio Industries and Businesses (ARIB), Japan
Kommentare zu diesem Artikel
Lin JC
(2009):
Cell-Phone Radiation and Cancer Studies in Normal Mice.
Themenverwandte Artikel
Lerchl A et al.
(2015):
Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans.
Paulraj R et al.
(2011):
Effects of low level microwave radiation on carcinogenesis in Swiss Albino mice.
Tillmann T et al.
(2010):
Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS-modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethylnitrosourea mouse model.
Saran A et al.
(2007):
Effects of exposure of newborn patched1 heterozygous mice to GSM, 900 MHz.
Smith P et al.
(2007):
GSM and DCS Wireless Communication Signals: Combined Chronic Toxicity/Carcinogenicity Study in the Wistar Rat.
Oberto G et al.
(2007):
Carcinogenicity Study of 217 Hz Pulsed 900 MHz Electromagnetic Fields in Pim1 Transgenic Mice.
Sommer AM et al.
(2007):
Lymphoma Development in Mice Chronically Exposed to UMTS-Modulated Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
Shirai T et al.
(2007):
Lack of promoting effects of chronic exposure to 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signals for IMT-2000 cellular system on development of N-ethylnitrosourea-induced central nervous system tumors in F344 rats.
Tillmann T et al.
(2007):
Carcinogenicity study of GSM and DCS wireless communication signals in B6C3F1 mice.
Masuda H et al.
(2006):
Effect of GSM-900 and -1800 signals on the skin of hairless rats. I: 2-hour acute exposures.
Sanchez S et al.
(2006):
Effect of GSM-900 and -1800 signals on the skin of hairless rats. II: 12-week chronic exposures.
Heikkinen P et al.
(2006):
No effects of radiofrequency radiation on 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone-induced tumorigenesis in female Wistar rats.
Huang TQ et al.
(2005):
Effect of radiofrequency radiation exposure on mouse skin tumorigenesis initiated by 7,12-dimethybenz[alpha]anthracene.
Shirai T et al.
(2005):
Chronic exposure to a 1.439 GHz electromagnetic field used for cellular phones does not promote N-ethylnitrosourea induced central nervous system tumors in F344 rats.
Sommer AM et al.
(2004):
No effects of GSM-modulated 900 MHz electromagnetic fields on survival rate and spontaneous development of lymphoma in female AKR/J mice.
LaRegina MC et al.
(2003):
The Effect of Chronic Exposure to 835.62 MHz FDMA or 847.74 MHz CDMA Radiofrequency Radiation on the Incidence of Spontaneous Tumors in Rats.
Heikkinen P et al.
(2003):
Effects of mobile phone radiation on UV-induced skin tumourigenesis in ornithine decarboxylase transgenic and non-transgenic mice.
Bartsch H et al.
(2002):
Chronic exposure to a GSM-like signal (mobile phone) does not stimulate the development of DMBA-induced mammary tumors in rats: results of three consecutive studies.
Zook BC et al.
(2001):
The effects of 860 MHz radiofrequency radiation on the induction or promotion of brain tumors and other neoplasms in rats.
Adey WR et al.
(2000):
Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of the central nervous system in Fischer 344 rats exposed to frequency-modulated microwave fields.
Adey WR et al.
(1999):
Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of the central nervous system in Fischer 344 rats chronically exposed to 836 MHz modulated microwaves.
Higashikubo R et al.
(1999):
Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields have no effect on the in vivo proliferation of the 9L brain tumor.
Imaida K et al.
(1998):
The 1.5 GHz electromagnetic near-field used for cellular phones does not promote rat liver carcinogenesis in a medium-term liver bioassay.
Repacholi MH et al.
(1997):
Lymphomas in Eµ-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields.
Salford L et al.
(1997):
Brain tumour development in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless cellular communication
Toler JC et al.
(1997):
Long-term, low-level exposure of mice prone to mammary tumors to 435 MHz radiofrequency radiation.
Wu RY et al.
(1994):
Effects of 2.45-GHz microwave radiation and phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate on dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer in mice.
Um diese Webseite für Sie optimal zu gestalten und fortlaufend verbessern zu können, verwenden wir Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie der Verwendung von Cookies zu.
