Home
Medizinische/biologische Studie (experimentelle Studie)

Effects of mobile phone radiation on X-ray-induced tumorigenesis in mice.

[Wirkungen einer Handy-Befeldung auf Röntgenstrahlung-induzierte Tumorgenese bei Mäusen].

Veröffentlicht in: Radiat Res 2001; 156 (6): 775-785

Ziel der Studie (lt. Autor)

Es sollten die Effekte schwacher hochfrequenter Befeldung auf die Krebs-Entwicklung in Mäusen bestimmt werden, die durch ionisierende Strahlung ausgelöst wurde.

Endpunkt

Exposition/Befeldung (teilweise nur auf Englisch)

Exposition Parameter
Exposition 1: 902,5 MHz
Modulationsart: FM, CW
Expositionsdauer: täglich wiederholte Exposition, 1,5 h/Tag, 5 Tage die Woche für 78 Wochen
Exposition 2: 902,4 MHz
Modulationsart: gepulst
Expositionsdauer: täglich wiederholte Exposition, 1,5 h/Tag, 5 Tage die Woche für 78 Wochen
Exposition 1
Hauptcharakteristika
Frequenz 902,5 MHz
Typ
Charakteristik
  • gerichtetes Feld
Expositionsdauer täglich wiederholte Exposition, 1,5 h/Tag, 5 Tage die Woche für 78 Wochen
Modulation
Modulationsart FM, CW
Zusatzinfo modulated with a random sequence of bytes
Expositionsaufbau
Expositionsquelle
Kammer Three identical rectangular waveguide chambers made of aluminium were used in the study. The exposure chamber consisted of a straight rectangular section (24.8 cm x 20 cm) and of two waveguide-to-coaxial adapters. The total length of the chamber with the adapters was 190 cm. The mice were kept in small cylindrical acrylic restrainers (i.d. 32 mm, length adjustable) preventing them from aligning their longitudinal axis parallel to the electric field. The restrainers were placed 25 at a time on a Styrofoam holder so that each mouse was in the center of the cross section of the waveguide with its longitudinal axis perpendicular to the electric field and the direction of propagation. The distance between adjacent mice was 5 cm. The mice that were missing were replaced with mouse phantoms made of plastic cylinders partly filled with a solution simulating the dielectric properties of muscle at 900 MHz.
Aufbau Modified and computer-controlled mobile phones were used as signal sources. The signals were amplified by boosters manufactured for vehicle use. RF power meters were used for measuring the input, reflected and output power of the exposure chamber. The output power was absorbed by a coaxial 10 W termination. The SAR was controlled daily by adjusting the input power.
Zusatzinfo The animals were randomized into four equal groups: NMT exposure, GSM exposure, sham exposure and cage control. The sham exposed group was kept in an unenergised waveguide chamber. The mice in all groups except the cage-control group were exposed to ionizing radiation at the beginning of the study. The total-body dose was 4 Gy delivered as three equal fractions of 1.33 Gy at 1-week intervals with linear accelerators. The dose rate was 0.51 Gy/min. To ensure a uniform irradiation of the whole body, a Plexiglas scatterer was placed 15 cm above the animals.
Parameter
Messgröße Wert Typ Methode Masse Bemerkungen
Leistung 6,1 W Mittelwert über Zeit gemessen - ± 0,8 W
SAR 1,5 W/kg Mittelwert über Zeit berechnet und gemessen Ganzkörper ± 15%
Zusätzliche Parameterdetails
ELF background MF < 0.09 µT; static earth MF 41-54 µT (inclination 80-90°)
Mess- und Berechnungsdetails
The whole-body-averaged SAR of mice was determined by the measurement of RF power absorbed in mice and a corrected conventional absorption equation. The SAR based on the power measurements was verified by measurements of the temperature increase of the phantoms for each phantom location. The two methods agreed within 2%. The spatial variation of the SAR due to reflections and power attenuation in the waveguide was estimated by electric-field measurements with a dipole probe. The maximum variation from the average SAR was about ± 30% for a 27-g mouse, and it decreased with the mass of the mouse. To ensure identical long-term average exposure, the order of animals in the Styrofoam holder was randomized for each exposure session. The estimated uncertainty of the whole-body-averaged SAR of an individual mouse during the whole exposure period was ± 15%. The measured SARs were compared with values obtained from FDTD calculations revealing that the ratio of the local maximum SAR inside the mouse to the whole-body-averaged SAR was from 4 to 8 and decreased with increasing mass of the mouse.
Exposition 2
Hauptcharakteristika
Frequenz 902,4 MHz
Typ
Charakteristik
  • gerichtetes Feld
Expositionsdauer täglich wiederholte Exposition, 1,5 h/Tag, 5 Tage die Woche für 78 Wochen
Modulation
Modulationsart gepulst
Tastgrad 12,5 %
Folgefrequenz 217 Hz
Zusatzinfo modulated with a random sequence of bytes
Expositionsaufbau
Expositionsquelle
Parameter
Messgröße Wert Typ Methode Masse Bemerkungen
Leistung 1,3 W Mittelwert über Zeit gemessen - ± 0,1 W
SAR 0,35 W/kg Mittelwert über Zeit berechnet und gemessen Ganzkörper ± 15%
Exponiertes System:

Methoden Endpunkt/Messparameter/Methodik

Untersuchtes Material:
Untersuchungszeitpunkt:
  • während der Befeldung
  • nach der Befeldung

Hauptergebnis der Studie (lt. Autor)

Die Ergebnisse zeigten keine ersichtlichen Wirkungen schwacher hochfrequenter Befeldung auf die durch Röntgenstrahlung hervorgerufene Tumor-Entwicklung.
Studienmerkmale:

Studie gefördert durch

  • Forschungsgemeinschaft Funk e.V. (FGF) (Research Association for Radio Applications), Germany
  • Elisa Communications Corporation, Finland
  • Benefon, Finland
  • Sonera, Finland
  • The Finnish Work Environment Fund
  • Tekes (National Technology Agency), Finland

Kommentare zu diesem Artikel

Themenverwandte Artikel

  • Lerchl A et al. (2015): Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans.
  • Tillmann T et al. (2010): Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS-modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethylnitrosourea mouse model.
  • Jian W et al. (2009): X-ray-induced apoptosis of BEL-7402 cell line enhanced by extremely low frequency electromagnetic field in vitro.
  • Cao Y et al. (2009): 900-MHz microwave radiation enhances gamma-ray adverse effects on SHG44 cells.
  • Shirai T et al. (2007): Lack of promoting effects of chronic exposure to 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signals for IMT-2000 cellular system on development of N-ethylnitrosourea-induced central nervous system tumors in F344 rats.
  • Tillmann T et al. (2007): Carcinogenicity study of GSM and DCS wireless communication signals in B6C3F1 mice.
  • Sommer AM et al. (2007): Lymphoma Development in Mice Chronically Exposed to UMTS-Modulated Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
  • Smith P et al. (2007): GSM and DCS Wireless Communication Signals: Combined Chronic Toxicity/Carcinogenicity Study in the Wistar Rat.
  • Oberto G et al. (2007): Carcinogenicity Study of 217 Hz Pulsed 900 MHz Electromagnetic Fields in Pim1 Transgenic Mice.
  • Saran A et al. (2007): Effects of exposure of newborn patched1 heterozygous mice to GSM, 900 MHz.
  • Zook BC et al. (2006): The effects of pulsed 860 MHz radiofrequency radiation on the promotion of neurogenic tumors in rats.
  • Verschaeve L et al. (2006): Investigation of co-genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in vivo.
  • Heikkinen P et al. (2006): No effects of radiofrequency radiation on 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone-induced tumorigenesis in female Wistar rats.
  • Huang TQ et al. (2005): Effect of radiofrequency radiation exposure on mouse skin tumorigenesis initiated by 7,12-dimethybenz[alpha]anthracene.
  • Shirai T et al. (2005): Chronic exposure to a 1.439 GHz electromagnetic field used for cellular phones does not promote N-ethylnitrosourea induced central nervous system tumors in F344 rats.
  • Sommer AM et al. (2004): No effects of GSM-modulated 900 MHz electromagnetic fields on survival rate and spontaneous development of lymphoma in female AKR/J mice.
  • Heikkinen P et al. (2003): Effects of mobile phone radiation on UV-induced skin tumourigenesis in ornithine decarboxylase transgenic and non-transgenic mice.
  • LaRegina MC et al. (2003): The Effect of Chronic Exposure to 835.62 MHz FDMA or 847.74 MHz CDMA Radiofrequency Radiation on the Incidence of Spontaneous Tumors in Rats.
  • Bartsch H et al. (2002): Chronic exposure to a GSM-like signal (mobile phone) does not stimulate the development of DMBA-induced mammary tumors in rats: results of three consecutive studies.
  • Bastide M et al. (2001): Toxicologic study of electromagnetic radiation emitted by television and video display screens and cellular telephones on chickens and mice.
  • Zook BC et al. (2001): The effects of 860 MHz radiofrequency radiation on the induction or promotion of brain tumors and other neoplasms in rats.
  • Imaida K et al. (2001): Lack of promotion of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-initiated mouse skin carcinogenesis by 1.5 GHz electromagnetic near fields.
  • Adey WR et al. (2000): Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of the central nervous system in Fischer 344 rats exposed to frequency-modulated microwave fields.
  • Adey WR et al. (1999): Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of the central nervous system in Fischer 344 rats chronically exposed to 836 MHz modulated microwaves.
  • Higashikubo R et al. (1999): Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields have no effect on the in vivo proliferation of the 9L brain tumor.
  • Imaida K et al. (1998): The 1.5 GHz electromagnetic near-field used for cellular phones does not promote rat liver carcinogenesis in a medium-term liver bioassay.
  • Repacholi MH et al. (1997): Lymphomas in Eµ-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields.
  • Toler JC et al. (1997): Long-term, low-level exposure of mice prone to mammary tumors to 435 MHz radiofrequency radiation.
  • Salford L et al. (1997): Brain tumour development in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless cellular communication
  • Wu RY et al. (1994): Effects of 2.45-GHz microwave radiation and phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate on dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer in mice.